Skip to main content

Buzzwords & Acronyms - Fun or Functional?

Or add to productivity and clarity?
I sat in a presentation the other day, and the presenter used the expression "In that space" at least 30 times, plus a few variations on the theme.   I am afraid after the first 5 I stopped concentrating on the content, and started waiting for him to say it again....
In business, we catch onto phrases and words and use them, ad nauseam.  Paradigm shift was a favourite for ages, it is still used, but not quite as extensively.   Then there are "blue sky" and "green field" projects or opportunities, and endless acronyms that can trip you up badly as they are used differently in various industries.
I ask, and then land up having every one, even the more obvious, explained patiently for the rest of the meeting.   One sweet young man translated IT for me, a few years ago, as Information Text.
Recently, I confirmed what PM stood for in a meeting.   There was a collective gentle, patronising drawing in of breath, and Project Management was supplied as the answer.  OK, I knew it wasn't Prime Minister, but it could have been People Management, Preventative Maintenance or possibly Post Meridian.  Private Messaging and Post Mortem also spring to mind.   I do accept that I should have picked up on context, but sometimes I am so busy trying to understand the acronyms that I miss the obvious!
Last year I went to an excellent 2 day conference.  It was hosted by one of the major software platform suppliers.  I spent most of the time on my iPad, looking up acronyms so that I could keep up with the very technical conversation…
I know it seems obvious now, but 24/7 took me a while to translate about 20 or more years ago.
While many of our expressions come from sport, or war, there are those that are from "back in the day".    “Opening the kimono” during a due diligence gave me pause.  “Getting into bed with” is another merger favourite!
We regularly pass the buck which has to stop somewhere.
Level playing fields are important as is understanding the amount of heat you can take before you have to get out of the kitchen.
Mindfulness!!!!!!!  Oh, how that one has hit the mainstream.   We have to be mindful of so many things all the time, what has happened to a bit of happy daydreaming?  I believe that Sony had a concept that allowed staff to spend 10% of their time just thinking as they believed that great ideas came from people allowing their minds to wonder in different, lateral directions.
In South Africa, a great many of us use the excuse of applying our minds when we need time to think something through, or simply to procrastinate!
And right now, we have disruption.  The word is disrupting so many good presentations that, once again, my concentration is flagging.  Not to mention its first cousin, innovative disruption.
Here are a few more regularly used buzzes:
Synergy, strategy, think outside the box and sea change.   I know that going forward and thinking holistically are two of my regulars.
Of course, who doesn’t want to be in their own wheelhouse?   Or be a thought leader?  
Spin up is another beauty – in the IT world this usually is aligned with tin(computer hardware for those who live generally tin free lives).
We throw around terms like IoT (Internet of Things), SaaS (and the various iterations of hosted solutions), Cloud in general and then we sneak in company names that could mean something else.   It took me a good few minutes in a meeting to establish that Pink Elephant was a company and not a new expression.
I have been suitably amazed by the fact that there are specific buzzwords that catch the attention of recruiters - apparently being able to conceptualise is a good one to throw in at some point.
We do it at Accsys, too.   Our internal business management report is the BFA, standing for Budget Forecast Actual.   I understand that there are some other interpretations, though…
My view is that many meetings are conducted in such a way that at least one person is scrabbling to understand what everybody else is saying as they sound like they are talking in code.
This means they are trying to convert the code in their heads, not actively participating and therefore wasting their time and yours.
Whenever there are new people at a meeting, I believe you should take the time to think about the conversational shortcuts you are taking, and use “longhand” words instead.  In the end, it will save you both time and money, not to mention new recruit frustration and disengagement.

Links, References and Notes

Management professor Robert Kreitner, "Buzzwords are the literary equivalent of Gresham's Law. They will drive out good ideas."[6]
@TerylSchroenn - twitter


Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.   Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog as the source.

Popular posts from this blog

Thinking of leaving - should you discuss it with your manager?

The exit interview is not the time to tell your manager that you would have stayed if.....   When you are serious about your career, and really enjoy your job, except for one key component, take the time to talk before you resign.

While sometimes the grass is greener, more often than not you just inherit new issues at a new company.

It is a difficult labour market in South Africa right now, there is a skills shortage, and yet there are millions of people without jobs.   Working for a stable company, with people you like, and a job you enjoy is important, and yet there are often those frustrations that give you itchy feet.

In your current position, your manager might really want to keep you, and be very interested in finding out what would make you a happier, more productive, employee.   It is also sometimes much easier to have that conversation with somebody you already know, than have it in your first weeks in a new position.

When you know you have choices, as well as know that you …

Agile workers & workspaces - a new way of working..

Being an agile worker is still a work in progress…
Is flexibility now a reality in the workplace?And is it really working? We keep renaming it – remote, activity based and agile work being some of the current terms. The assumption of control over one’s own time and deliverables does look like a great way to work and live, and it seems to be is a high priority for those entering the business world. There is also the development of the agile work space, where people come to the office each day, but don’t have a fixed work area.We used to call it hot desking back in the day and it met with mixed success.Today, office designers have started to create work spaces which are intended to encourage innovative thought, cross departmental collaboration and improved productivity. My research indicates that the mix of engaged and disengaged employees in an open plan workspace does not always have the desired effect of the positive workers influencing the culture.In fact, a case study of a senior execut…

Setting Budgets and Targets

Does too much of a stretch impact motivation?    Over many years of setting (and trying to achieve) targets and budgets, getting the balance right between stretch and motivation remains a challenge.

I love Jim Collins and Jerry Porras and their BHAGs in their great book, Built to Last, but if the goals are seen as unachievable too early in the business year, what then?

Is there a way for businesses to achieve success without budgets and targets in place?

Two old favourites " You can only manage what you can measure" and "People do what managers measure" suggest that they can't.  I am sure there must be successful businesses with different methodologies, but most of us need to work towards something.

With that in mind, I think there needs to be stretch, and there needs to be a sense of achievability.

Why would you race against Usain Bolt unless you think you could win?

The same goes for budgets and targets, people need to believe they are possible.

So how do you…