Skip to main content

Sharing your last salary – re-enforcing the gender pay gap…


Sharing your last salary – re-enforcing the gender pay gap…

The interview process is never easy.  Whether you are actively searching for a new position or being head hunted, selling yourself effectively can go against ingrained social habits.
As a potential employer, there is significant risk in hiring the wrong people, too.
So both sides have a lot to lose if the interview process is ineffective.
While we frequently hear that people do not leave jobs because of money, very few candidates are looking to drop their salaries …
Interviewers have a number of tools at their disposal enabling them to align the right candidate with the role on offer:
·       Psychometric testing
·       References
·       The face to face interview process
·       The CV / Resumé
·       Social media profiles
However, the previous salary is a time tested way for the interviewer to measure against the skills and experience claimed in the CV.
Why is there a risk that this re-enforces the gender gap?
Well, let’s look at the following scenario.
·       Company ABC has vacancies in two of their divisions for Financial Managers.
·       They decide on two candidates, Joe and Sarah, both in their late 30s with the same undergrad degree and both with around 10 years of experience.  They are each asking for 55k.
·       The 55k is around the budgeted amount although management had been hoping to offer around 53k each.
·       HR asks both candidates for a copy of their previous payslip.   Joe was on 50k and Sarah on 45k.   The reason Sarah is leaving her current company is that she has realised that her male counterparts that she studied with are all earning between 10 and 20% more than she is, and she is hoping to close that gap.
·       As the 50k is slightly over the 10%, she accepts.  Joe also accepts a 10% increase and gets the 55k.  The company are now 1k below their budget, too.   Sounds like a win for everybody!
·       However, this affects the rest of their careers at ABC.  His salary level means that bonuses and incentives are based on a higher number for him.  He is seen as senior if execs are looking at financial statistics and so he has the advantage when promotions are available and so it goes on.
The factors around your salary are much more complex and have a higher impact than you can imagine.  So the negotiations at the beginning are crucial.

How should Sarah handle this admittedly hypothetical situation?
If she knows there are two positions available, she could ask if the same salary is on offer for both, because she had benchmarked salaries and believes that the R55k is more market related.
She could also query whether they are basing the offer on her previous salary and ask whether they would have offered the 55 if she was on 50.
She could share that the opportunity is exciting and she is really keen to join ABC but express concerns and explain that one of her main reasons for moving is to close the gender pay gap and it seems that somebody with her experience and qualifications should be closer to 55k than 50.
The management now have the choice to even the playing field or stick to the original offer.
Companies do need to benchmark and they can ask pertinent questions so as to establish whether it is a pay gap or delivery issue.   Sarah can respond that she believes she was delivering at the same level as the men earning 10% more - not more, not less, but the same and that the only reason for the salary differential was her gender. 
What happens next will tell Sarah a lot about the company and whether she wants to work there or not.
But without the conversation, there is no chance of achieving her financial goals.
Employers aim to hire the right people for the right job at market related salaries.   The tools they have available create a picture of whether each candidate fits the profile.   The previous salary forms part of this picture.
Employers will continue to ask as long as it legal to do so (although there are places where it is not, Puerto Rico and certain American states, among them).  
As a candidate it is difficult to refuse to answer but responding that you would prefer to wait for an offer and then negotiate around that offer, is not unreasonable, or requesting a guide line as to budget for the role and confirming whether your salary requirements are within in that band is another way to handle the question.
The closing of the gender pay gap is a complex issue and there are many factors contributing to it.  Taking that into account, the previous salary may act as a guideline, but both companies and candidates should be aware that it could contribute to extending the gap.


Links, References and Notes

Accsys provides people management solutions ie Payroll, Human Resources (HR), Time and Attendance as well as Access Control/Visitor Management.
The company develops, implements, trains and services our solutions.  We provide readers, turnstiles, booms and CCTV.
We run both on premise and in the cloud, as well as mobile options for ESS.  Recruitment, online education and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) are part of our offering, too.
http://www.accsys.co.za/accsys-peopleplace-talent-management
email:      tschroenn@accsys.co.za
twitter:   @TerylSchroenn

Note:   Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.   Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog as the source.

Popular posts from this blog

Thinking of leaving - should you discuss it with your manager?

The exit interview is not the time to tell your manager that you would have stayed if.....   When you are serious about your career, and really enjoy your job, except for one key component, take the time to talk before you resign.

While sometimes the grass is greener, more often than not you just inherit new issues at a new company.

It is a difficult labour market in South Africa right now, there is a skills shortage, and yet there are millions of people without jobs.   Working for a stable company, with people you like, and a job you enjoy is important, and yet there are often those frustrations that give you itchy feet.

In your current position, your manager might really want to keep you, and be very interested in finding out what would make you a happier, more productive, employee.   It is also sometimes much easier to have that conversation with somebody you already know, than have it in your first weeks in a new position.

When you know you have choices, as well as know that you …

Agile workers & workspaces - a new way of working..

Being an agile worker is still a work in progress…
Is flexibility now a reality in the workplace?And is it really working? We keep renaming it – remote, activity based and agile work being some of the current terms. The assumption of control over one’s own time and deliverables does look like a great way to work and live, and it seems to be is a high priority for those entering the business world. There is also the development of the agile work space, where people come to the office each day, but don’t have a fixed work area.We used to call it hot desking back in the day and it met with mixed success.Today, office designers have started to create work spaces which are intended to encourage innovative thought, cross departmental collaboration and improved productivity. My research indicates that the mix of engaged and disengaged employees in an open plan workspace does not always have the desired effect of the positive workers influencing the culture.In fact, a case study of a senior execut…

The Gig Economy - HR and other issues

The Gig Economy has emerged as a topic of discussion and I understand that Intuit has posited that 40% of US workers will be independent contractors by 2020.  That is 3 years away! What is a gig employee?  Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb all utilize gig employees as the delivery mechanism for their apps.   While they are all clear that they are just an App and don’t employ the gig employees, governments and employer bodies are analyzing the risks and reports are indicating that they are significant. As a contract worker, which is how Uber defines their drivers, there is not an employer/employee contract in place.    While Uber, and other similar companies, create the mechanism for people to deliver a service, they consider themselves brokers, for want of a better word, and not employers. The UK is looking into the situation and considering legal structures .  The concerns are particularly when people have a single source of income, although they are not formally employed.  This leaves them in a …