Skip to main content

Benevolent Sexism

Possibly an extension of paternalism, benevolent sexism, and his ugly brother, hostile sexism, have become a subject of much study.   And then there is the stepbrother, ambivalent sexism, to add to the mix.

Mentioned in Sheryl Sandberg's best seller Lean In, it is a topic that is definitely gaining momentum among women in business.    The fact that it is seen as higher in people in traditional marriages (man being the major breadwinner) is very interesting, particularly as the use of the word people is deliberate, both men and women in traditional marriages, are often seen as being benevolently sexist.

Melanie Tannenbaum's article has received a lot of commentary, and both the article and the comments are well worth reading.  Because it isn't simple, most times telling a woman she looks great is just a compliment!   But there are times when the line gets crossed.

At a recent talk I gave, a young woman asked how she should handle being patronised, because she had achieved something that was traditionally seen as in the male arena.   Comments from the men included "Well, if she can do it, it must be easy".   She did receive a lot of congratulations, too but she clearly feels that the achievement has been a little tarnished by the reactions.

Over the years in business, I have also noticed a few differences in the questions I am asked about the company I manage, compared to men in similar positions.   I attend many functions, and we swap business cards, as you do.   As soon as people read my card, and see that I am in the C-Suite (one of my least favourite new buzz expressions), they start to try and pin down the size of the company.   While asking annual turnover is one of the questions, how many employees seems to define it for my questioners.  I am sure it is possible that men do get asked the same questions, too, but I have not observed it!

It is also the compliment, or acknowledgement, with a note of surprise in the voice.   Many of the more high powered women I know, comment that this is pervasive.    You have to develop a sense of humour around this, and just say thank you.

While hostile sexism is easy to recognise, and counter, benevolent and ambivalent sexism are much more difficult to handle.

You can start to come over as "whiney" and "difficult" because what is being said sounds positive.   And men suffer from it, too.   Rikki Rogers has written a very interesting article "Woman are kind, and men are strong...." which outlines how both sexes are damaged by gender generalisation.

One of my favourite examples is the Yvonne Brill obituary.   She was a rocket scientist whose press obituary focused on her maternal and culinary skills.   The Broad Side wrote a spoof obituary for Albert Einstein, using the same method.   While I am sure she loved being a mom and a great cook, the reason she was being featured in the newspaper was for her science expertise, which was treated as an afterthought.

Its all about striking the right balance, both in how we live and how we are thought of in the work place.

Try for a light, but firm, touch when confronting benevolent sexism, but do confront it.  It needs to be in the open if women are to continue advancing their careers and equalising the pay gaps.


Links, References and Notes

www.accsys.co.za
Rikki Rogers
Melanie Tannenbaum
The Broad Side
Sheryl Sandberg


Note

Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.   Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog as the source.






















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Feeding the Right Wolf

Feeding the Right Wolf This Cherokee story resonated with me (see below).     Like many business people, I get caught up in managing details, instead of focusing on strategy and growth.   Measuring myself against the Good Wolf concept has become a way of thinking for me. Feeding the good wolf - focusing on the right stuff! In a previous article on this topic, I commented that the message is simple, the wolf you feed is the one that grows. The good wolf attributes in a business are where we ideally should spend our time, that good old 80 – 20 rule focusing on our   engaged employees, improving client experience and quality of product,   to name a few. Creating a Good Wolf Environment While we have many different tools – appraisals, customer and employee surveys – to try and understand the temperature and levels of entropy in our businesses – the truth is that it is really difficult to explain to people that they are not seen as feeding the good wo...

Its all about the numbers - retirement age

Weight, height, age, dress size, shoe size, all numbers that we (and the media) use to define people. I was fascinated by an article from the Leicester Mercury where the age of each witness to a bus crash in January were carefully listed. Sue Kellett, 56, whose front garden is bordered by the wall, was one of the first at the scene. Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#ixzz31lXUuyZg Read more at http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#9cHShVptF30lJw4X.99 Sue Kellett, 56, whose front garden is bordered by the wall, was one of the first at the scene. Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#ixzz31lXUuyZg Read more at http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.htm...

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?  And how to tell? Dissecting Employee Behaviour We spend hours of management time dissecting employee behaviour to ensure that not only is each employee delivering to a minimum expectation, he or she is not actively undermining the effectiveness of the business. We design KPAs (or KPIs, or whatever we want to call them), we run regular appraisals, we discuss career paths and succession plans, and  as long as toxic employees are delivering on their job description, we keep them! It’s only after they leave, when you hear the collective deep breath of relief from colleagues and management, that you can be absolutely sure of the negative impact. Underperformance vs Undermining My view has changed – rather an underperformer, than an underminer. So what to do? Once you have firmly established that undermining is the problem, the first step is to tell them that you are onto them! Never an easy task, because very few p...