Are adults the present, if children are our
future!
Business, life, politics, we are always
planning ahead, so much so that sometimes we neglect the very real present.
We attach such importance to age that news
articles rarely neglect to mention the chronological number of the star of the
story.
People are “too young” or “too old”. When are we like the porridge in Goldilocks
“Just right”? I am not sure if we ever
are.
We have bought into the idea that if you
haven’t achieved certain career objectives by 35 or 40, you never will, success
has passed you by. And guess what? Hirers often buy into that, making the move
into executive roles for the first time at 50 or 55 almost impossible.
A disadvantage to women (and men) who
decide that work and family during their child rearing years need to be more
integrated and less career driven.
Just over 15 years ago, I was advertising a
management role. An extremely bright
young man in the department came to me with an application for the
position. He was 23. I must have looked (or sounded) a bit
doubtful. He sat back in his chair, and
asked “If I was 33, would you give me the job?” He got the promotion! And has made me proud of his many successes
ever since…
Political careers have a very different
trajectory, with people well past business retirement age standing for senior
office. What is the difference?
At my previous company, our Chairman of the
Board was in his 90s, still making a significant contribution.
My message? If you can, create a good balance along the
age spectrum. Don’t take it for granted
that your older staff are no longer creative, and equally, don’t fall into the
trap that deep experience is required for leadership roles.
Age is a guideline that allows actuaries to
make excellent predictions, but it is not an absolute rule.
Links and References
email:
tschroenn@accsys.co.za
twitter: @TerylSchroenn
Note
Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.
Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog
as the source
Comments
Post a Comment