Skip to main content

Its all about the numbers - retirement age

Weight, height, age, dress size, shoe size, all numbers that we (and the media) use to define people.

I was fascinated by an article from the Leicester Mercury where the age of each witness to a bus crash in January were carefully listed.

Sue Kellett, 56, whose front garden is bordered by the wall, was one of the first at the scene.


Louis…, landlord of the Royal Anglian pub, …..“I heard it first, there was a loud screech, followed by a bang,” said the 44-year-old. 

While I understand the use of age in statistical analysis, why would the age of the witnesses be essential to this story?

I suppose we should appreciate that they were not described as plump, short or wrinkled.  Age is a simple, descriptive leveller.   However, it is true that we define people by their age, not their maturity, natural abilities, skill or experience.   Many brilliant 25 year olds are knocked out of the running for senior roles because they are too young on paper and many over 50 year olds find it difficult to continue to grow their careers.

A favourite expression is it "It is time to hand over to the younger generation" .  Maybe it should be more about sharing, rather than handing over.

Look at all the great sportsmen and women who are becoming successful coaches and mentors.

With scientists now talking about longer life spans, we should all be thinking about how we are going to keep the economy going if people are going to live for 30 to 50 years after current retirement ages.

The highest retirement age I could find was Finland at 68, although I am interested that there are still a number of countries where retirement age differs for the genders.   Earlier for women, although they outlive men in all but 4 countries, based on info from wikipedia. ( Tuvalu, Tonga, Kuwait, and Qatar.)

In the past 50 years, life expectancy has grown significantly.   In the US, from 1930 to 2010, the average life expectancy has risen by 20 years.   In 1930, it was 59.7.   A retirement age of 55 or 60 looked pretty reasonable then.

The Evolution of Retirement states that in 1880, the majority of men over 64 continued to work.   Today it is the minority.  They continue that it is dropping in men between 55 and 64, as well.   When we know that life expectancy is up, we have to assume that we are going to have to raise retirement ages, sooner rather than later.

There is at least one scientist who says that the first person to live to 150 has already been born.

If you are in your twenties right now, this is the time to start thinking about it.

Should you be leading companies and countries in 2054, and you are expecting to live until you are at least 100, what would you like the retirement age to be?                    


Links, Notes and References

 Living to 150 years old?
Retirement Ages
Leicester Mercury
Life Expectancy US - 1930 to 2010
The evolution of retirement
Accsys (Pty) Ltd

Note
Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.   Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog as the source.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feeding the Right Wolf

Feeding the Right Wolf This Cherokee story resonated with me (see below).     Like many business people, I get caught up in managing details, instead of focusing on strategy and growth.   Measuring myself against the Good Wolf concept has become a way of thinking for me. Feeding the good wolf - focusing on the right stuff! In a previous article on this topic, I commented that the message is simple, the wolf you feed is the one that grows. The good wolf attributes in a business are where we ideally should spend our time, that good old 80 – 20 rule focusing on our   engaged employees, improving client experience and quality of product,   to name a few. Creating a Good Wolf Environment While we have many different tools – appraisals, customer and employee surveys – to try and understand the temperature and levels of entropy in our businesses – the truth is that it is really difficult to explain to people that they are not seen as feeding the good wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?  And how to tell? Dissecting Employee Behaviour We spend hours of management time dissecting employee behaviour to ensure that not only is each employee delivering to a minimum expectation, he or she is not actively undermining the effectiveness of the business. We design KPAs (or KPIs, or whatever we want to call them), we run regular appraisals, we discuss career paths and succession plans, and  as long as toxic employees are delivering on their job description, we keep them! It’s only after they leave, when you hear the collective deep breath of relief from colleagues and management, that you can be absolutely sure of the negative impact. Underperformance vs Undermining My view has changed – rather an underperformer, than an underminer. So what to do? Once you have firmly established that undermining is the problem, the first step is to tell them that you are onto them! Never an easy task, because very few p...
Post a Comment
Read more