Skip to main content

Is any decision better than none?

Decisions, decisions, decisions

Slow decision making is seen as weak leadership.   True or False?

People make comments like “Well, at least he makes decisions” as if any decision is better than none.

And once a decision is made, woe betide the leader who changes his or her mind.

No matter that new facts have come to light, or that certain information was deliberately withheld, leaders who change their minds are incompetent in the eyes of many.

So getting the balance right between sourcing all the relevant facts to make a decision, and not waiting so long that you are seen to be a procrastinator, is not easy.

And allowing yourself to be forced into decision making because of outside opinion is also not a great choice.

Leaders have to accept early in their careers that popularity based on decisions made should  not be a goal. It can be a nice side effect as long as you realise that it will only be a small group that like most of your decisions, and a much larger one that believes they could do it better.

Watch a sports game with supporters from both teams on the field, and you will quickly see that it is only decisions that favour your side that gain you popularity………..

In any legal process, there is the option of an appeal.

In business, life and politics, we do not easily grant ourselves that same right.

Why not?

If people who have studied the law believe that the verdict of one person (plus assessors or jury) is not always enough, surely the rest of us should be equally balanced.

Of course, there is always the risk of constantly second guessing yourself and never moving forward.

One of the ways we manage this at +Accsys is to use the Decision Tree and divide our decisions into leaf, branch, trunk and root levels.   Leaf being easy to make, not requiring consultation or follow up, all the way down to root, where the decision will set precedents, and is a consultative one.   (Susan Scott).

Most importantly, if you feel you have made the wrong decision, STOP the process.   (Slow down, Think, Observe, Proceed), re-evaluate, garner new information, and then make a new decision.   You might even go back to your first one, but with much more confidence that it is right.

I keep the STOP sign on a door in my office to remind me not to rush into decisions nor to draw hasty conclusions.   We also have copies of the Decision Tree at various places in the building.   Neither always work, but they are great reminders.

Links, References and Notes

www.fierceinc.com - Susan Scott - Fierce Conversations
Business Connexion
Business Connexion:Accsys
email:      tschroenn@accsys.co.za
twitter:   @TerylSchroenn
Note

Thank you for reading Teryl@Work.   Should you wish to use any of the material, please acknowledge this blog as the source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Its all about the numbers - retirement age

Weight, height, age, dress size, shoe size, all numbers that we (and the media) use to define people. I was fascinated by an article from the Leicester Mercury where the age of each witness to a bus crash in January were carefully listed. Sue Kellett, 56, whose front garden is bordered by the wall, was one of the first at the scene. Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#ixzz31lXUuyZg Read more at http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#9cHShVptF30lJw4X.99 Sue Kellett, 56, whose front garden is bordered by the wall, was one of the first at the scene. Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.html#ixzz31lXUuyZg Read more at http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Bus-driver-airlifted-hospital-collision-tractor/story-20512289-detail/story.htm...

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?

Is the employee toxic or simply disengaged?  And how to tell? Dissecting Employee Behaviour We spend hours of management time dissecting employee behaviour to ensure that not only is each employee delivering to a minimum expectation, he or she is not actively undermining the effectiveness of the business. We design KPAs (or KPIs, or whatever we want to call them), we run regular appraisals, we discuss career paths and succession plans, and  as long as toxic employees are delivering on their job description, we keep them! It’s only after they leave, when you hear the collective deep breath of relief from colleagues and management, that you can be absolutely sure of the negative impact. Underperformance vs Undermining My view has changed – rather an underperformer, than an underminer. So what to do? Once you have firmly established that undermining is the problem, the first step is to tell them that you are onto them! Never an easy task, because very few p...

Feeding the Right Wolf

Feeding the Right Wolf This Cherokee story resonated with me (see below).     Like many business people, I get caught up in managing details, instead of focusing on strategy and growth.   Measuring myself against the Good Wolf concept has become a way of thinking for me. Feeding the good wolf - focusing on the right stuff! In a previous article on this topic, I commented that the message is simple, the wolf you feed is the one that grows. The good wolf attributes in a business are where we ideally should spend our time, that good old 80 – 20 rule focusing on our   engaged employees, improving client experience and quality of product,   to name a few. Creating a Good Wolf Environment While we have many different tools – appraisals, customer and employee surveys – to try and understand the temperature and levels of entropy in our businesses – the truth is that it is really difficult to explain to people that they are not seen as feeding the good wo...